Legal Opinion
Williams v. St. Paul Companies
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 1, 1997No. A97A1402PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Judge.
Attorney Peter Williams sued The St. Paul Companies (“St. Paul”) alleging St. Paul tortiously interfered with his representation of clients in two separate lawsuits. The trial court granted St. Paul summary judgment, and Williams appealed. For reasons which follow, we affirm.
“To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A defendant may do this by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Perry & Co. v. New South Insurance Brokers of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Pakwood Industries, Inc. v. John Galt AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Continental Insurance v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Justice v. Davidson Kennedy Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
3Cited by4 opinions
- Home Insurance v. WynnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Dowse v. Southern Guaranty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Universal Management Concepts, Inc. v. NoferiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Miller v. Georgia Interlocal Risk Management AgencyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998