Legal Opinion

United States v. James Bryan Hufford, United States of America v. Jerry Martyniuk

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 26, 1976No. 75-2454 and 75-3632PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before DUNIWAY and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and BATTIN, * District Judge. BATTIN, District Judge.

The defendants were charged with possession with intent to distribute amphetamines, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The defendants filed a motion to quash the search warrant and suppress the evidence. Following an evidentiary hearing; the District Court granted Hufford’s motion to suppress and quash and denied Martyniuk’s motion.

After waiving his right to a jury trial, defendant, Martyniuk, was tried on stipulated facts and found guilty on all counts alleged in the indictment.

Martyniuk…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. State v. BobicWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. BobicWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. United States v. Leonard Joel DubrofskyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Robert Conroy, Raymond Dahl, Frederick Jacobs and Walter K. Schubert, United States of America v. Leonard A. Walker, A/K/A "Silver"Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. Frederick H. MooreCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API