Legal Opinion

Beasley v. Hull

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 15, 1966No. 32263PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADY, Commissioner.

Plaintiff brought an action seeking recovery of $250.00 which he had previously paid to the defendant for a set of false teeth. Trial in the magistrate court resulted in a judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $250.00 and costs. On appeal to the circuit court a jury was waived and the court entered judgment in favor of the defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

The facts in the case, insofar as thej need to be set out in this opinion, show that the plaintiff had been without teeth for a number of years prior to the time he first went to the defendant and asked to have a set of false…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bayer v. American Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  2. Glaze v. GlazeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Jennings v. JenningsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. Mayo v. LasaterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barber v. M. F. A. Milling Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Carrell v. CarrellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Roberts v. Progressive Northwestern Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API