Legal Opinion
United States v. Doe
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 13, 1973No. Misc. 73-93PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DITTER, District Judge.
In this case the government wishes to have immunity granted a witness so he can be compelled to testify before a grand jury. He opposes the application, asserting the immunity to be afforded will not protect him from prosecution based on his testimony.
On June 16, 1973, Daniel Cahalane appeared before a Federal grand jury sitting in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. After being sworn, Cahalane refused to answer questions pertaining to the purchase of certain firearms in the United States contending that to do so might tend to incriminate him.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Commission of InvestigationSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. VuitchSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- In Re Kenneth Tierney. In Re Paschal Morahan. In Re Daniel Crawford. In Re Mathias Reilly. In Re Thomas LaffeyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- In the Matter of the Grand Jury and Susan Marie ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- In Re CardassiDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena of Martin Flanagan. United States of America v. Martin FlanaganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Houston WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena of FlanaganDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1982
- Cahalane, Appeal OfCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Duffy, in ReCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.