Legal Opinion

Holden v. Koger

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 9, 1925No. 1746PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

Holden sued Koger to recover a commission alleged to have been earned for effecting the sale to J. E. White-side of a section of land in Dawson county owned by Koger. Hall & Grammar, engaged in the real estate business as partners, intervened in the suit, claiming that they were entitled to the commission. For convenience the parties will be hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, defendant, and inter-veners. An instructed verdict was returned in favor of the interveners. The only issue in the ease is whether the efforts of the plaintiff or interveners were the procuring cause of the sale.

Appell…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Keener v. ClevelandTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  2. Bath v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  3. McGlasson v. FiorellaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. John A. Dickson Pub. Co. v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. John A. Dickson Pub. Co. v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API