Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Markulin v. Ashtabula County Board of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1992No. 92-1864PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We deny the writ for the reasons that follow.

Relator raises five issues:(1) that the rejection of her petition violated the open meetings law, R.C. 121.22;(2) that respondent erred by finding that she was a “non-qualified circulator elector”;(3) that respondent erred by finding her a “non-qualified elector”;(4) that the proceedings surrounding the rejection of her petition were tainted by corruption; and(5) that to the extent that R.C. 3513.261 imposes a durational residency requirement for independent candidates, it violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Clements v. FashingSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Chimento v. StarkDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1973
  4. Chimento v. StarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. In re Protest Filed with the Franklin County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Purdy v. Clermont County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Purdy v. Clermont Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Stine v. Brown County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State ex rel. Markulin v. Ashtabula Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API