Legal Opinion

Neill V. Brackett

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 16, 1922PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

When this case was before us, Neill v. Brackett, 234 Mass. 367, the executor’s exceptions were sustained. The case then went to trial in the Superior Court on the issue of the fraud and undue influence of Mary E. ■ Fallon and Sally S. D. Richards in procuring the will of Edward E. Richards. The court ruled that a finding of undue influence would not be warranted, and directed the jury to return a negative answer to the issue submitted: “Was said alleged will procured to be made through the fraud or undue influence of Mary E. Fallon and Sally S. D. Richards, or either of them? ”

Many of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shailer v. BumsteadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Neill v. BrackettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  3. Aldrich v. AldrichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Gorham v. MoorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  5. Old Colony Trust Co. v. Di ColaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Victoria Coach Line, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Raposa v. OliveiraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  3. Greene v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. In re Allowance of Last Will of ReedSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
  5. Allen v. GuarenteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API