Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Raton v. Sproule

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1967No. 8214Published

1DissentNoble, Justice

I agree that generally the people of a state are supreme in determining what the state constitution shall be and that in the exercise of their sovereign power they may alter or amend their constitution as they choose. The New Mexico Constitution, however, prescribes the method by which it may be altered or revised. Such provisions regulating its own amendment are mandatory, and a strict observance of every substantial requirement is essential to the validity of an amendment thereto. Hillman v. Stockett, 183 Md. 641, 39 A.2d 803; Tipton v. Mitchell, 97 Mont. 420, 35 P.2d 110; Boyd v. Olcott,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kerby v. LuhrsArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Boyd v. OlcottOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Gafford v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. State ex rel. School District v. GordonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  5. Hillman v. StockettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API