Legal Opinion

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company v. The Medical Protective Company

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 18, 1982No. 80-2340PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOGAN, Circuit Judge.

The appeal in this diversity case arises out of a dispute between two insurance companies over which has to pay portions of a medical malpractice settlement against a professional corporation and a doctor it employed. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company (St. Paul), which had written excess liability policies, paid $300,000 of the $400,000 settlement, and brought suit against The Medical Protective Company (Medical Protective) to recover $200,000 of the amount paid. The trial court ruled in favor of St. Paul, construing the insurance contracts to require $300,000 to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clayton v. Alliance Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  2. McNemee v. Farmers Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Medical Protective Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Westchester Fire Ins. Co. v. City of Pittsburg, Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  2. New Castle County v. Continental Cas. Co.(CNA)District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
  3. The Coleman Company, Inc. v. California Union Insurance Company, a Foreign Corporation Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, a Foreign Corporation, and Avreco, Inc., a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Third Party v. Insurance Management Associates, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. Coleman Co. v. California Union InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. Dicesare v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API