Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Wm. Cameron &. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 22, 1935No. 13101PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■ LATTIMORE, Justice.

We are requested not to consider the assignment of error of appellant as being too general. That assignment is that the court erred in rendering judgment against him for $1,017, being the unpaid balance of $936 on the verified account sued on plus interest. The assignment is too general to be approved, but it is followed by propositions which make the exact points involved entirely clear. The entire brief is short and the facts simple, and we have concluded, therefore, that we will entertain it.

The appellee sued appellant, alleging a balance in the sum of $766.36, with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marr-Piper Co. v. BullisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. Joseph v. BostickTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Southwestern Inv. Co. v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Renz, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
  2. Shahan-Taylor Co. v. Foremost Dairies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  3. Angeles v. Brownsville Valley Regional Medical Center, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  4. Stephens v. Mills CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. J. R. Gray Co. v. Ritchey Flying Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API