Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Haynie

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1892No. 3209PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

GAENES, Associate Justice.

On the 25th day of October, 1890, R. P. Buckingham conveyed to appellee a certain stock of merchandise for the benefit of his creditors. Certain of the creditors brought suit against Buckingham and caused attachments to issue and the goods to be seized and sold thereunder. Appellee brought this suit against the constable who levied the writ and the sureties on his official bond, as well as against the creditors who caused the attachments to issue, to recover damages for the seizure and sale of the property. The plaintiff having recovered a judgment, the defendants…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. J. M. Robinson & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. MayoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  2. Taylor v. Missouri Glass Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  3. Leo Sheep Co. v. DavenportCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Tittle v. VanleerTexas Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API