Legal Opinion

United States v. Sullivan

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 19, 1953No. Crim. 1696-53PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

The question presented is whether the action of a law enforcement officer in listening to a telephone conversation between an informer and a suspect, with the knowledge and consent of the former, is within the ban of the statute prohibiting what is popularly known as “wire tapping”.

This is a motion to suppress evidence in a criminal prosecution for violations of the Narcotic Acts. The motion is directed against articles seized pursuant to a search warrant on premises occupied by the defendant. It is claimed that the search warrant was illegally issued in that the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Crooks v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Rathbun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Monroe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  3. People v. MalotteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. SapersteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Ralph B. Carnes and Roger W. Smallwood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API