Legal Opinion

Ballagh v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 17, 1914No. Civ. No. 1603PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Review to annul an order adjudging petitioner guilty of contempt. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Davis, Kemp & Post, E. L. Foster, Charles A. Barnhart, L. R. Godward, and Geo. E. Whitaker, for Petitioner.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an application for a writ of review to annul an order of the court below adjudging petitioner guilty of contempt for the disobedience of its judgment.

Petitioner is city clerk of the city of Maricopa. On March 23, 1914, certain proceedings were instituted in the superior court, in and for the county of Kern, the purpose of which was to secure a writ of mandate directed to petitioner, as said city clerk, commanding him in his official capacity to place and print upon the official ballot to be used in the municipal election held in the city of Maricopa on April 13, 1914, the name of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Superior Court of San Diego Cty.California Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Palache v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dunn v. MUNICIPAL COURT FOR EUREKA JUDICIAL DISTRICTCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Bailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API