Cole v. Segraves
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Lassen County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
Ejectment. Defendant demurred to the complaint, on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. His demurrer having been sustained, and plaintiff declining to amend, final judgment was entered dismissing the action, and for costs. Plaintiff appeals.
The complaint consists of two parts, in the first of which there is an attempt to set up a valid title in plaintiff to the demanded premises, founded on a sale for delinquent taxes. The second part of the complaint contains the general allegations usual in actions of this character.
Various objections…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Loranger v. NadeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Rogers v. CadyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Mullan v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Smart v. PeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Peninsula Properties Co. v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.