Howard v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DONOFRIO, Judge.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the superior court which affirmed the final administrative decision of the Department of Economic Security. The superior court held that the services performed by drivers and helpers in moving and setting up mobile homes constitutes employment for Howard Smith and Geneva Smith, dba Arizona Mobile Home Movers, as defined in A.R.S. § 23-615; remuneration of these services constituted wages within the meaning of A.R.S. § 23-622; that appellants were employers subject to the Employment Security Act with coverage commencing January 1,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Illinois Tri-Seal Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- McClain v. ChurchArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Beaman v. Superior Products, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Greyvan Lines, Inc. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
3Cited by6 opinions
- Erspamer Advertising Co. v. Department of LaborNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
- Dial-A-Messenger, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Moore v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Fullerton v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Dynometrics v. ades/enriquezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.