Legal Opinion

Bear Stearns Security Corp. v. 900 Capital Services, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 5, 2002No. 1:01-cv-04027PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

GARAUFIS, District Judge.

Now before the court is a motion to dismiss brought jointly by defendants 900 Capital Services, Inc. and Zimmerman, Axelrad, Meyer, Stern & Wise, P.C. (“900 Capital” and “Zimmerman Axelrad” respectively, together the “Moving Defendants”) in this statutory interpleader action brought by plaintiff Bear Stearns Security Corp. (“Bear Stearns”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1335.

I. Background

The following facts are taken from the complaint and moving papers, and are undisputed unless otherwise noted.

Bear Stearns brought this statutory in-terpleader to resolve…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. TashireSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Beate Bernheim v. Jeffrey LittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  5. Hoover v. RonwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. 29-33 Ninth Avenue, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
  2. The United States Life Insurance Company In The City of New York v. DeJesusDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API