Legal Opinion
Nevins v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 7, 1949No. 10686PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Circuit Judge.
The district judge decided in favor of the defendant, Curtiss-Wright Corporation, in this court action brought by James Wilson *536Nevins under section 8(e) of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, as amended, Section 308(e), Title 50 U.S.C.A., and Nevins has appealed.
When inducted into the United States Army on September 30, 1942, the appellant was working as a tool maker in the employ of the appellee at its plant in Columbus, Ohio. His rate of .pay, at the time of his induction, was $1.15 per hour. Following His honorable discharge from the Army on April 21,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Trailmobile Co. v. WhirlsSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Dwyer v. Crosby Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Trailmobile Co. v. WhirlsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
- Hewitt v. System Federation No. 152 of Ry. Employees' Dept. of American Federation of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Addison v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Brown v. Watt Car & Wheel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
- Bova v. General Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
- Brown v. Denver Post, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1956
- Donald Lang Kenneth Beck Michael Erickson, Cross-Appellants v. Great Falls School District No. 1 and A, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.