Legal Opinion

Romani v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 1, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, J.

These are suits by the driver of an automobile and his passenger to recover damages for injuries received in a collision between the automobile and the defendant’s freight train at Jones’ crossing in Milford. The view of the respective actors was largely obstructed by a hill extending alongside the defendant’s right of way nearly up to its intersection with the state highway from Milford to Wilton. The defendant had installed an automatic bell to warn travelers of the approach of trains; but there was evidence that the bell was inefficient for that purpose, and that complaint concerning it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cavanaugh v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1911
  2. Burnham v. StillingsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1911
  3. Fuller v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1917
  4. Alden Speares Sons Co. v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stocker v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  2. State v. MannionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  3. Colby v. LeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  4. Cyr v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API