Legal Opinion

Wilkinson v. Wright

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 11, 1933No. 6 Div. 409PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is a bill in equity filed by the heirs of Edward L. Wilkinson, deceased, who was a non compos mentis. His wife,' Hattie Ann WTLMnson, was appointed his guardian during his life, and administratrix after his death. The bill alleges that during his life, and pending the guardianship, the guardian, through decrees of the chancery and probate courts, sold the real estate of the ward to pay debts and for investment. By the terms of such sales, she received part cash, with the balance payable in installments; evidenced by the notes and mortgages -of the pur- . chasers. That she…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Truss v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  2. Ford v. BordersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. O'Neal v. CooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. Webb v. ButlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. CoferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lewis v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Littleton v. LittletonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Faulk v. MoneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. Stamey v. FortnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Casey v. KrumpSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API