Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Commissioner of the Department of Correction v. Rittenhouse
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided December 20, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice:
This condemnation action was initiated by the State of Delaware, upon relation of the Commissioner of the Department of Correction (“State”). The named defendants included John S. Rittenhouse and Thomas Brittingham, trading as Ludlow Industrial Park Partnership (“Ludlow Partnership”). Ludlow Partnership requested that a trial be held to determine the amount of just compensation for the taking of its property. 10 DelC. § 6108.
A trial was held in the Superior Court before a judge and a panel of three condemnation commissioners (“Commissioners”). See id. The Commissioners…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Sharp v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Baetjer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
- Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- State v. SilverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- DeSilva v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- County of Kauai v. Hanalei River Holdings Limited.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
- Greene v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012