Legal Opinion
Electrolux Corp. v. Val-Worth, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 8, 1959PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge Conway.
The plaintiff is the manufacturer of the widely known ‘ ‘ Electrolux ’ ’ vacuum cleaner. The defendants-respondents are Solomon Sacks, who does business as “ Famous Vacuum Shops ” and “ Famous Appliance Shops,” and Vacuum Cleaner Conservation Company, Inc., of which Sacks is the president and principal stockholder.
It appears that respondents have been purchasing used ‘ ‘ Model XTT ’ ’ Electrolux vacuum cleaners from plaintiff and others since 1948 for prices ranging from $3.00 to $7.50 each. *560Respondents would then disassemble the machines, clean and rebuild them, and, when…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- International News Service v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Mountain Timber Company v. State of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Howe Scale Co. v. Wyckoff, Seamans & BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Rothschild v. . Title Guarantee Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Saratoga Vichy Spring Co., Inc. v. Orin Lehman, Commissioner of Parks and Recreation of the the State of New York and Waters of Saratoga Springs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Loughry v. Lincoln First Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Flexitized, Inc., and Flexitized Sales Corporation v. National Flexitized Corporation and Dubin-Haskell Lining Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Mayer v. Josiah Wedgwood & Sons, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Roy Export Company Establishment Of Vaduz, Liechtenstein v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.