Legal Opinion

Totusek v. Department of Employment

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1975No. 11449PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Justice.

This is an appeal from a determination of the State Industrial Commission that appellant Richard Totusek was an employer, that certain of his subordinates were performing “covered employment” under the Employment Security Law, that moneys paid to those persons for services were “wages,” and that Totusek was liable for unemployment insurance contributions.

H & R Block Company operates income tax preparation businesses in many states. Appellant Totusek has a franchise agreement with H & R Block which authorizes him to operate income tax preparation offices in northern Idaho.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Toland v. SchneiderIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Swayne v. Department of EmploymentIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Hammond v. Department of EmploymentIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Continental Oil Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Division of Industrial Accident BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Booth v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Nebeker v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Department of Employment v. Bake Young RealtyIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Larsen v. State, Dept. of EmploymentIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Beale v. State, Department of EmploymentIdaho Supreme Court · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API