Legal Opinion

Patz v. City of San Diego

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 27, 2025No. E083543MPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 8/27/25 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO DANIEL PATZ et al., E083543 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super.Ct.No. 37-2015-23413-CU- MC-CTL v. ORDER MODIFYING CITY OF SAN DIEGO, DISSENTING OPINION Defendant and Appellant. [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] We modify the dissenting opinion filed in this matter on July 30, 2025, as follows: On page 13 of the dissent, at the end of the first partial paragraph and as part of that same paragraph, after the sentence ending “section 6(b)(3) is…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API