Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 12, 1976No. 75-1725PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.

The Department of Health, Education and Welfare here seeks review and reversal of a judgment of the District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma which temporarily enjoined the Department, and particularly the Food and Drug Administration, from preventing appellee Rutherford from obtaining a supply of a controversial cancer drug called Laetrile for his own use. An order was issued on behalf of Rutherford which allowed him to purchase and transport in commerce a six months’ supply of Laetrile and accompanying drugs. In the course of this order the trial…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Kordel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Weinberger v. Bentex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Seven Cases of Eckman's Alternative v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. National Nutritional Foods Ass'n v. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Rutherford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  2. National Nutritional Foods Ass'n v. MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. Rutherford v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1977
  4. United States v. X-Otag Plus TabletsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1977
  5. Rutherford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API