Legal Opinion
Kalamazoo River Study Group v. Menasha Corporation Eaton Corporation, Rockwell International Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 5, 2000No. 99-1197PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Kalamazoo River Study Group (“KRSG”) is an unincorporated association of paper manufacturers seeking to recover costs incurred in the investigation and remediation of contamination by polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in the Kalamazoo River. KRSG brought suit against eight corporate defendants, including defendants-appellees Me-nasha Corporation and Eaton Corporation, pursuant to the contribution provision of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. The district court granted summary…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Edward E. ERCEGOVICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Amoco Oil Company v. Borden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Commonwealth Edison Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- United States v. John DemjanjukCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- State of New Mexico v. General ElectricCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Kalamazoo River Study Group v. Rockwell International Corporation and Eaton CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.