Navarro v. Santa Cruz, County of
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 Maria Del Carmen Hernandez, et al., No. CV-24-00353-TUC-SHR 11 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER 13 14 v. 15 16 County of Santa Cruz, et al., 17 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss for Failure to 22 State a Claim (Doc. 32). The Motion to Dismiss is fully briefed. (Doc. 20; Doc. 36; Doc 23 37.) For the reasons set forth below, the Motion to Dismiss is denied in part and granted 24 in part, and Plaintiffs are given leave to amend. 25 I. Factual Background1 26 This…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.