Legal Opinion

Rottmund v. Continental Assurance Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 27, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-5970PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HUYETT, District Judge.

This is an action brought by the Estate of David R. Artz pursuant to the Pennsylvania Slayers Act, 20 Pa. Cons. Stat.Ann. §§ 8801-8815 (Purdon 1975 & Supp.1989), for the proceeds of two life insurance policies. Plaintiff Patti M. Rottmund, formerly Patti M. Artz, is suing in her capacity as the Executrix of the Estate of her former husband, David R. Artz. The life insurance policies in question insured the life of the decedent David Artz and were issued by defendants Continental Assurance Company (“Continental”) and Constitution Life Insurance…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Scarano v. Central R. Co. Of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  3. Continental Insurance Co. v. Kenneth BodieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  4. Paul J. Glick v. White Motor Company v. North American Rockwell Corp., (Third Party Defendant)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  5. Sidney P. Small and William Landesman, D/B/A Small & Landesman v. Seldows Stationery, Jack Belowitz, Irving Platt and Irwin KatzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rottmund v. Continental Assurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Arrowood Indemnity Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2011
  3. U.S. Bank N.A. v. O'Meara, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API