Ouellette v. Butler
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.
The plaintiffs brought this action to enjoin the defendants’ use of their land. We are asked to determine whether an *186instrument which on its face gives the defendants a “license” to use the plaintiffs’ land may, under the circumstances of this case, be deemed to create an irrevocable interest; i.e., an easement. The Superior Court (Cann, J.), approving the recommendation of a Master (.Robert A. Carignan, Esq.), ruled that the instrument in question, viewed in the light of the drafter’s knowledge, was clearly intended to convey an irrevocable interest and could be deemed to do so,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morrill v. Mackman.Michigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Waterville Estates Assoc. v. Town of CamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Sawin v. CarrSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Robbins v. Lake Ossipee Village, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- MacKay v. BreaultSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Flanagan v. PrudhommeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- Behrens v. S.P. Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- Locke Lake Colony Ass'n v. Town of BarnsteadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Richey v. LeightonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Quality Discount Market Corp. v. Laconia Planning BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.