Legal Opinion

Stroh v. Holmes

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 4, 1924No. Appeal, 31PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

The pending question arose on a rule taken by the defendant for judgment in favor of the defendant on the whole record after a trial in which the jury failed to agree. The defendant borrowed from S. D. Stroh, trustee, $5,500 on March 25,1914; to secure the payment of which he gave to the lender a bond and mortgage. Stroh died on September 12,1918. Sometime thereafter the use-plaintiffs, in whose behalf Stroh held the fund, caused judgment to be entered on the bond; thereupon the defendant presented a petition to have the judgment opened in order that he might defend to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Young v. HippleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Dunmore v. PaddenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Krewson v. SawyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. In re Estate of RhoadsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  5. Stauffer v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morningstar v. North East Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Haze v. Home Friendly Insurance Co. of MarylandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Schade v. DetarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Carlisle Tr. Co. v. Myers Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API