Legal Opinion
Carlisle Tr. Co. v. Myers Et Ux.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 12, 1936No. Appeal, 15PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldbige, J.,
The plaintiff obtained a judgment under a sci. fa. sur mortgage for but a part of the amount claimed to be due. It appealed.
The facts were not in dispute. On June 24, 1927, the defendants executed four bonds, each in the sum of $1,000, secured by a mortgage given to Harry M. Leidigh, Esq., as trustee for the holders of the bonds. Three of these bonds were assigned to three Hemminger brothers. Leidigh became involved in serious financial difficulties. In June, 1933, the Carlisle Trust Company was appointed trustee of this $4,000 mortgage in place of Leidigh.
The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Flaccus v. WoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Meaker Galvanizing Co. v. Charles E. McInnes & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Wright v. Bristol Patent Leather Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Hosler v. HurshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Laughead v. H. C. Frick Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Robert F. Mohr v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969