Legal Opinion

Christman v. Seymour

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 27, 1985No. 2 CA-CIV 5163PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LIVERMORE, Judge.

In 1966 defendant Monte Seymour, acting as a real estate broker, negotiated a sale of property to a trust comprised of the following beneficiaries: plaintiffs Harry and Mildred Christman (25%), plaintiffs John and Joan Offer (12V2%), defendant Harvey Gutmann (12'/2%), defendant Sam Alvarado (12'/2%), defendant Glenn Lance (12'/2%), Seymour (18%%), and Robert DeBolt (6V4%). Defendant Stewart Title & Trust became successor trustee of this trust. The trust provided that the trustee, on Seymour’s direction if he was acting on instruction from a majority of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Leff v. GunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Page v. PageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Baker v. LeightArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Jerman v. O'LEARYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. Ornamental and Structural Steel, Inc. v. BBG, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. DiGiulioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  2. Golleher v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API