Legal Opinion
Cahn v. Schmitz
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided January 13, 1941No. Civil No. 4271PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
The plaintiff William Schmitz (a minor), through his guardian ad litem Martha Schmitz, brought an action ag’ainst Charles Cahn and others for damages for personal injuries he alleges he sustained in their employment. What disposition was made of the action as to “other” defendants is immaterial. On January 6, 1933, the case as to Cahn was tried before the court without a jury. At the conclusion of the trial, the court caused the following minute entry to be made:
“ ... it is ordered that upon the presentation of a formal, written judgment by the plaintiff, and its approval and signing by the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Williams v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1926
- Forbach v. SteinfeldArizona Supreme Court · 1928
- Edwards v. HellingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Chiricahua Ranches Co. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Johnson v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Department of Revenue v. Southern Union Gas Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Lloyd's of London v. Walker, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
- Ronan v. First National Bank of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Western Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Diamond Lazy K Guest Ranch, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- De Lao v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.