Legal Opinion

Miller v. Roy W. Heinrich & Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1970PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

Plaintiff filed this suit for a declaratory judgment seeking to establish that a strip of land had become a public street by implied dedication. Plaintiff appeals from a decree in favor of the defendants.

The property involved in this case was owned by Florence Tongue Munger and other members of her family. In 1909 they had a survey conducted and the property platted for the purpose of selling lots. The proposed plat was not approved by the city or the county because of conflicts with another subdivision.

The plat included a street called Broadway which was 60 feet wide and approximately 400…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McCoy v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Huddleston v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Kurtz v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Security & Investment Co. v. Oregon CityOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Portland Baseball Club v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Haman v. FoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Muzzy v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Mid-Valley Resources, Inc. v. Foxglove Properties, LLPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Mid-County Cemetery District v. ThomasonOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State Highway Commission v. BaumanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API