Legal Opinion

Karger v. Karger

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1897PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action for absolute divorce.

1Opinion of the Court

Pbyob, J,

Hpon‘ the evidence the adultery of the defendant is an inevitable conclusion. Still, the plaintiff is not entitled to *237a divorce if the offense was committed by his procurement or with his connivance. Code Civ. Pro., § 1758..Suspecting a criminal connection between his wife and one Stein, the plaintiff concerted with the witness Wolf a scheme for detecting the defendant in the act. She was in the habit of visiting Stein at his room in Wolf’s house; and the arrangement was that the plaintiff should go to the house and Wolf “would show it to him.” He went to the house and was so…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dunn v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  2. Smith v. SmithNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
  3. Burns v. BurnsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Robbins v. RobbinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  5. Morrison v. MorrisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Phinizy v. PhinizySupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Wright v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Huffine v. HuffineVan Wert County Court of Common Pleas · 1947
  5. Biers v. BiersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API