Legal Opinion

Rittenhouse v. Kemp

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1871PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.

Suit by the appellant against the appellees on the following writing obligatory:

“Twelve months after date we, or either of us, promise to pay Alexander Rittenhouse, or order, the sum of two thousand and two hundred dollars, for value received, without any relief from valuation or appraisement laws whatever.
“David Kemp, [seal.]
“December 11th, 1865. Jacob Fox. [seal.]”

Fox answered, separately, first, that he was only security on the obligation for Kemp, which fact was known to Rit.tenhouse, and that Rittenhouse, by agreement with Kemp, *259in consideration of the payment, in advance, of interest at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thornton v. WynnSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Stuyvesant v. DavisNew York Court of Chancery · 1842
  3. Moore v. PaineNew York Supreme Court · 1834
  4. Chilton v. Robbins, Paynter & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1842
  5. Cunningham v. PoolSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Huffmond v. BenceIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Durham v. CraigIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Montgomery v. HamiltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Tipton v. CarriganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API