Legal Opinion
Tolliver v. Cudahy Packing Co.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided June 13, 1941No. 216PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DARR, District Judge.
This suit is brought by an employe for himself and all other employés similarly situated, under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219. Sometime after the complaint was filed other persons claiming to be employes similarly situated filed an intervening complaint seeking like recovery 'for themselves.
The defendant has filed a motion to dismiss on the grounds (1) that there is no jurisdiction because the amount sued for is less than $3,000, (2) that the complaint discloses that the. plaintiff is not such employe as can receive the benefits of said act, (3)…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
3Cited by11 opinions
- Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. NisleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- Pentland v. Dravo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation and Vanadium Corporation of America v. Frank Nisley, Jr., Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation and Vanadium Corporation of America v. John F. Wade, Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation and Vanadium Corporation of America v. Howard Balsley, Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation and Vanadium Corporation of America v. UnnamedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Booth v. Montgomery Ward & Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1942
- Bank One, Texas, National Ass'n v. ElmsDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.