Legal Opinion

Colorado Continental Lumber Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 16, 1930No. H-388PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

Plaintiff insists that it has a right to maintain this suit and to have the court determine its right to include in invested capital, as a paid-in surplus, the alleged cash value of good will, on the ground that, although it did not make the inclusion in invested capital of good will a specific ground for its claim for refund, it was the duty of the commissioner to decide the ease upon the facts before him, and that plaintiff had filed with the commissioner certain documents in which it claimed a substantial value for good will as the ground for special assessment.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Daily Pantagraph, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lewis A. Crossett Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
  2. Strong Pub. Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
  3. James S. Kirk & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API