Whitehead v. Commission on Judicial Discipline
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*1460OPINION
2Per curiam
The following opinion and judgment of the court constitutes an unprecedented but necessary response to a certain document filed by the dissenting justice and two disqualified justices in one of the court’s administrative files on September 15, 1995. The document in question purports to be an “order” declaring actions of this court to be “void,” and otherwise overruling substantive rulings of the constitutionally-empaneled court sitting in this case. Because two of the justices who signed the mentioned order were disqualified to act in this case, because notice and due process were…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Whitehead v. Nevada Com'n on Judicial DisciplineNevada Supreme Court · 1995
4Cited by5 opinions
- Lagstein v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS, LLOYD'S, LONDONCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Del Papa v. SteffenNevada Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re Honorable DavisNevada Supreme Court · 1997
- Whitehead v. Comm'n on Jud. DisciplineNevada Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re Honorable DavisNevada Supreme Court · 1997