Legal Opinion
Roseann R. v. William R.
New York City Family Court
Decided July 1, 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Guy P. De Phillips, J.
An issue of the constitutionality of section 449 of the Family Court Act, is raised on the instant motion by petitioner to disaffirm the hearing examiner’s report with respect to the amount and effective date of support.2 This support proceeding under articles 4 and 5-A of the Family Court Act was commenced by the Commissioner of Social Services as assignee of Roseann R., the wife of respondent William R. Petitioner alleges that respondent is chargeable with the support of his wife and their child, Roseann, born September 6, 1977 and has refused to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. BroadieNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Forrest v. . ForrestNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- McCarthy v. . McCarthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Golden v. GoldenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commissioner of Social Services v. GrantNew York City Family Court · 1992
- Commissioner of Social Services ex rel. Foreman v. MilienNew York City Family Court · 1993
- Commissioner of Social Services v. Daniel S.New York City Family Court · 1984
- Richardson v. JuniousNew York City Family Court · 1986
- Commissioner of Social Services v. John H.New York City Family Court · 1984