Legal Opinion

Adair v. Metropolitan Building Co

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 22, 1972No. Docket 10132PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTargonski, J.

Plaintiff was employed by defendant * 1 as a building superintendent of the Metropolitan Building, an office building in the City of Flint. Plaintiff, his wife, and son lived in the building in a five-room apartment which defendant provided.

Plaintiff was required to be on call, more or less, 24 hours per day for security purposes. His duties were to supervise and direct the independent maintenance firm which was employed by defendant to clean the building. Plaintiff was also required to see that the doors of the building were locked at night and unlocked in the morning. He was required to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Crilly v. BallouMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Whetro v. AwkermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Dyer v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Meyers v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Hutsko v. Chrysler CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Medacco v. Campbell, Wyant & Cannon Foundry Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Simkins v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Michales v. Morton Salt Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Thomas v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Denny v. KostadinovskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API