Legal Opinion

Adamo v. Dillon

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 2012No. 1:10-CV-02382PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

SYLVIA H. RAMBO, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Anthony Adamo (“Adamo”), a licensed race horse trainer, and Michael Gill (“Gill”), a licensed race horse owner, brought this case challenging the constitutionality of their ejections from Penn National Race Course (“Penn National”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Additionally, Adamo challenges the constitutionality of the subsequent suspension of his horse trainer’s license. A bench trial was held from April 23 to April 26, 2012. For the following reasons, the court finds that Plaintiffs’ claims fail either as a matter of law or as a result…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Borrell v. Bloomsburg UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Brown v. Harris 6034District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  3. Dowdall v. Downs Racing, L.P.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Krug v. Bloomsburg UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. Linder v. ChuckasDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API