Adamo v. Dillon
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
SYLVIA H. RAMBO, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Anthony Adamo (“Adamo”), a licensed race horse trainer, and Michael Gill (“Gill”), a licensed race horse owner, brought this case challenging the constitutionality of their ejections from Penn National Race Course (“Penn National”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Additionally, Adamo challenges the constitutionality of the subsequent suspension of his horse trainer’s license. A bench trial was held from April 23 to April 26, 2012. For the following reasons, the court finds that Plaintiffs’ claims fail either as a matter of law or as a result…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Borrell v. Bloomsburg UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Brown v. Harris 6034District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- Dowdall v. Downs Racing, L.P.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Krug v. Bloomsburg UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- Linder v. ChuckasDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.