Guardianship of P.T.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McEVERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] R.P. and J.P. appeal from a juvenile court order terminating their guardianship. We affirm the juvenile court’s findings that it is in the best interests of the children to terminate the guardianship.
I
[¶ 2] On April 5, 2013, the State petitioned for termination of R.P. and J.P.’s guardianship of their grandchildren, P.T., M.T., A.M.-T., R.T., and S.M., alleging the children were deprived, the children had been in foster care for 450 out of the previous 660 nights, and it was in the best interests of the children that the guardianship be terminated. A combined hearing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Investors Title Insurance Co. v. HerzigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Yon v. J.T.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Akerlind v. BuckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Gonzalez v. GonzalezNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Estate of AlbrechtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Keller v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Interest of J.O.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Interest of G.V.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- State v. DavisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.