Legal Opinion

In Re Cottrell

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 22, 1992No. 91-498PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Orange Superior Court granting a conditional use permit and site plan approval to applicant, Walter Cottrell, to operate a veterinary clinic in the Newbury Town Center Commercial District. Appellants, Jack and Veira Anderson, are neighbors to the clinic’s proposed location. They argue that the zoning amendment that allowed veterinary clinics in the district is invalid because of defects in the adoption process. We reverse.

The process that led to the zoning amendment began with a petition signed by over 5% of the voters of Newbury to amend the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hasbrouck Heights Hospital Ass'n v. Borough of Hasbrouck HeightsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. Smith v. Town of St. JohnsburySupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  3. George v. Town of EdentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. In Re McCormick Management Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  5. Fish v. Town of CantonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Heffernan v. HarbesonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  2. In Re Paynter 2-Lot SubdivisionSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  3. Simendinger v. City of BarreSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  4. Roddy v. RoddySupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  5. Richards v. NowickiSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API