Legal Opinion

Schwab Safe & Lock Co. v. Snow

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1915No. 2798Published

Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. F. G. Loofbourow, Judge. Action by Schwab Safe & Lock Company against O. C. Snow. Judgment for defendant on his counterclaim. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING.

FRICK, J.

Counsel for appellant has filed a petition for rehearing in which he assails practically every proposition decided against his contentions. He somewhat severely criticises us for not stating our reasons more at large upon some of the propositions where the ruling is against him. As a sample of his criticism we refer to the following: Counsel, in his original brief, urged that the defendant had waived his right to recover damages for the reason, as counsel contends, that defendant had continued to recognize the contracts of sale as being in force after the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dingley v. OlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Phillips & Colby Construction Co. v. SeymourSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Hubbardston Lumber Co. v. BatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Becker v. BeckerIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Claudius v. West End Heights Amusement Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API