Douglas v. Butcher
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
This suit arose under the partition statutes. Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. Article 6082 et sfeq.-, and the suit was dismissed when the. plaintiffs refused to join some 230Q persons who were royalty owners in the McAllen Fieldwide Unit, which unit emhraced, an undivided one-half of the oil, gas and other minerals in thirty-four acres of undeveloped land sought to be partitioned by that suit.
L. A. Douglas and George R. Brown, plaintiffs below, each own one-fourth of the oil, gas and other minerals under the thirty-four acres of land described in their petition for partition. They have…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Veal v. ThomasonTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- City of Beaumont v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1947
- Simmons v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Henderson v. ChesleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Fischer v. Rio Tire Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sims v. SimsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Dierschke v. Central National Branch of First National Bank at LubbockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Texas Oil & Gas Corp. v. OstromCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Brelsford v. ScheltzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Carter v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.