Legal Opinion

Taylor v. New Jersey

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 24, 2010No. 08-2774PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Raheem Taylor, a prisoner in New Jersey proceeding pro se, appeals the District Court decision dismissing his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for failure to exhaust his claims in state court. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm.

I

In February 2007, Taylor was convicted in Superior Court, Burlington County, of second-degree robbery. He received a sentence of five years’ imprisonment. Taylor was represented by a public defender at trial and, after his conviction, requested that his attorney file a notice of appeal.

Although the notice of appeal was due before the end of April 2007,…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Kenneth Lee v. William Stickman Stephen Zappala, Jr. Michael FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  3. Hankins v. FulcomerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  4. Wojtczak v. FulcomerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  5. Moore v. Deputy Commissioner(S) Of Sci-HuntingdonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. PEEK v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API