Taylor v. New Jersey
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Raheem Taylor, a prisoner in New Jersey proceeding pro se, appeals the District Court decision dismissing his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for failure to exhaust his claims in state court. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm.
I
In February 2007, Taylor was convicted in Superior Court, Burlington County, of second-degree robbery. He received a sentence of five years’ imprisonment. Taylor was represented by a public defender at trial and, after his conviction, requested that his attorney file a notice of appeal.
Although the notice of appeal was due before the end of April 2007,…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kenneth Lee v. William Stickman Stephen Zappala, Jr. Michael FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Hankins v. FulcomerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Wojtczak v. FulcomerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Moore v. Deputy Commissioner(S) Of Sci-HuntingdonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- PEEK v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025