Legal Opinion

Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. Williams

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided January 6, 1937No. 2029-6774PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARVEY, Commissioner.

In the trial court, the defendant in error, Sidney Williams, recovered judgment for compensation, under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 8306 et seq.) for incapacity for work, resulting from the loss of 95 per cent, of the use of his right hand and the total loss of the use of his left eye. The judgment has been affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 69 S.W.(2d) 519.

Although many questions are presented, they relate mostly to matters which probably will not occur at another trial; therefore there is no need for us to state the case any further…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Texas Employers Insurance v. GuidryTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Jones v. Texas Employers InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Williams v. Safety Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Petroleum Casualty Co. v. DeanTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Consolidated Casualty Insurance Co. v. PerkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Middleton v. Hartford Acc. & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  5. Petroleum Casualty Co. v. GarrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API