Legal Opinion

Gabay v. Rosenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 8, 1968PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On remittitur from the Court of Appeals (19 H T 2d 899), judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered September 22,1965 upon an agreed statement of facts, affirmed, with costs. The action is for specific performance of a partnership agreement. In July, 1961 plaintiff and defendant’s testator filed a certificate of doing business under the name of Homefield Realty. On December 2, 1961 they entered into a written agreement which provided “ that in the event of the death of Saul Rosenberg, Leda Gabay, the surviving partner shall have the sole right to purchase the full interest in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lanier v. BowdoinNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. McCarthy v. PieretNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. In re the Estate of EddyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
  4. In Re the Estate of EddyNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Warrin v. WarrinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. G & S INVESTMENTS v. BelmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. In re GusmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Isaacson v. Beau Label Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Rotenberg v. ChamberlainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Polner v. Monchik Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API