Legal Opinion

K. Petroleum, Inc. v. Hubacek

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided March 29, 2024No. 6:22-cv-00005Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION (at London) K. PETROLEUM, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 6:22-CV-05-CHB ) v. ) ) BERNICE HUBACEK, ) MEMORANDUM OPINION ) AND ORDER Defendant. ) *** *** *** *** This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff K. Petroleum, Inc.’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. [R. 19]. Defendant Bernice Hubacek has responded in opposition [R. 20], and K. Petroleum has replied [R. 21]. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant K. Petroleum’s motion in part and deny it in part. I. BACKGROUND This action arises out of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Mcpherson v. KelseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Wendell LayneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API