Thomas S. v. Morrow
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge:
The primary issue in this appeal is whether the district court properly applied the principles explained in Youngberg v. Romeo, 457 U.S. 307, 102 S.Ct. 2452, 73 L.Ed.2d 28 (1982). In Youngberg the Court recognized that a patient in a state mental institution has a right to “adequate food, shelter, clothing, and medical care.” *369457 U.S. at 315, 102 S.Ct. at 315. Young-berg also established that a mentally retarded person involuntarily committed to a state institution retains liberty interests secured by the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Kirtley v. RaineyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Kirtley v. RaineyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Philadelphia Police & Fire Ass'n for Handicapped Children, Inc. v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Lelsz v. KavanaghCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Clark v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.